The fundamental importance of the PMI phase stems from a range of factors.
Chief among these is the varying impact that the announcement of a merger or acquisition has on different stakeholder groups:
- Employees of the acquiree
are typically concerned with job stability and looking to management for details around the organizational structure of the new entity.
- Employees of the acquiror
are less likely to feel unsettled, but will be keen for an understanding of the deal drivers, opportunity created, and long-term company vision.
- Customers of both businesses
will want confirmation of how contractual obligations and account support will be handled, with similar questions raised by partners and suppliers.
- Investors in the acquiror
will be looking for details around projected shareholder returns, with a particular focus on the underlying deal rationale and forecast timeframes for realization of upside.
Successfully handling this range of stakeholders requires a clearly defined communication strategy – one that provides a framework for each manager, team, and leadership group to effectively communicate with related parties quickly and responsively, despite the inevitably shifting parameters of a complex initiative.
Interestingly for business leaders, this blueprint for cross-factor communications during a time of rapid change has many important parallels with government and corporate communications throughout the coronavirus pandemic.
What we can learn from COVID communications
In a daily press conference from 2nd April 2020, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau stated “we’ve learned a lot from South Korea, Singapore, and other countries. We’ve learned unfortunately a lot from Italy as well, in terms of what worked and what didn’t work there.”
Based on the template built by South Korea, Canadians could take notes on creating a rapid-response epidemic control system that integrates communications.
That wasn’t always the case - during the 2015 Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) outbreak, South Korea’s lacklustre response and unclear communications fostered anxiety among the public.
However, the system was reformed - South Korea’s Centre for Disease Control now houses an Office of Communication, specifically designed to prevent misinformation and control the flow of certified data for decision-making and broadcasting.
During COVID-19, communications were effective and efficient because key channels of distribution (for instance, an emergency text message system) were already in place, established in anticipation of similar high-pressure scenarios.
Since 2016, this Office of Communication has recruited members of the general public to assess and guide its messaging strategies. South Korean compliance with public health guidelines in 2020 is far greater than it was during MERS, demonstrating that institutionalization can also expand capacity to measure, understand, and respond to public sentiment during a pandemic, including on social media.
Around the world, similar patterns have been observed – governments, scientists, and healthcare services have succeeded or failed to varying degrees not purely as a result of their decision-making, but based on their ability to rapidly communicate complex initiatives under time pressure, and to a wide range of stakeholder groups.
Capturing Hearts & Minds
However, infrastructure and process alone are not enough.
Even the most efficient messaging system is ineffective if the recipient is not emotionally committed to engaging with the instructions or advice being issued.
Once more, this has been evidenced widely throughout the pandemic, with populations’ faith in their governments and media significantly impacting their willingness to comply with recommendations or restrictions.
The parallel with PMI scenarios continues here too, with any communication strategies fundamentally dependent on the underlying engagement of the stakeholder groups in question.
One of my mentors, Daniel Hughes, once told me to never underestimate the importance of capturing people’s “hearts and minds” before any strategic initiative. It is my firm belief that capturing hearts and minds is crucial to successful PMI, as well as for pandemic-related crisis management.
Key to capturing hearts and minds is the ability to use communication structures to listen, understand, and deliver information effectively so that you can build trust and stability. Trust and stability counteract the uncertainty and anxiety created by major changes.
Communications strategies which are built around top-down unidirectional directives often fail in this regard, and avoiding this trap was a key component of success in my career when delivering Elementis's successful acquisiton and integration of Summit Reheis.
Key Takeaways
Designing and implementing effective communication strategies is a vital aspect of fully capturing the value potential of a merger or acquisition.
Government leadership and business share the same core aims:
- Tailor the approach to clearly-defined stakeholder groups
- Enable rapid two-way information flow
- Build trust and stability to win hearts and minds